Idealní by byl Eside :-)))))až na pana ředitele.LE

A je to v prdeli, ted prijdem o stadion a ten novej majitel rozproda celej kadr :(

v klidu, nás jen koupili velcí kamarádi Gross a Paroubek :)

Fakt, že nás nevlastní ENIC, by měl být starý osmnáct měsíců. Tehdy hrozily potíže s tím, že Spurs a Slavia měly jednoho majitele a kvalifikovaly se do Poháru UEFA. Tehdy se snad měla stát Slavia majetkem majitele ENICu, teoreticky Daniela Levyho, ale prakticky pana Joe Lewise, jednoho z nejbohatších lidí na světě. Změna majitele není žádná katastrofa, naopak za posledních osmnáct měsíců se hodně věcí změnilo k lepšímu
O Lewisovi moc nevím, tak citát z BBC:
But then Mr Levy is backed by Joe Lewis, a Bahamas-based businessman who made billions from dealing in international currency and futures markets.
That is the same Mr Lewis who, in July 1999, made headlines for suggesting the euro could fall below parity against the dollar. The euro currently stands at about $00.90.
Tantalos

Klid, jestli je ta změna stará 18 měsíců, tak není, co řešit, od té doby se naše situace jen a jen zlepšuje :-) Myslím si, že to je jen poplašná zpráva, ostatně když si vzpomeneme na možnost, že jsme mohli propadnout do UEFY z předkola s Ajaxem a všichni byli ledově klidní... Je vidět, že se to už dávno předtím nějak pořešilo.

ted mi to teprve dochází s tim stadionem!! proto se furt říkalo a vpodstatě mlžilo s tim kdo bude jako vlastník, furt se řikalo že kopíruje akciovou strukturu slavie..!! takže se o stadion nebojim.. stadion a novej vlastník si tohle to probraly už dávno před tim rokem a půl takže se o budoucnost nemusíme bat, ale sem zvědavej jako asi všichni kdo nás bude vlastnit-ten KEY Invest. je jen zprostředkovatel a pravděpodobně nás "vlastní" 1,5 roku.. a za tu dobu nás měl střelit a ted je pro něj nejlepší možnost..

Je to Kellner pánové,Kellner!!!

PPF není žádnej super majitel... víc by mohli říct asi lidé z firem, které prošly rukama PPF.

Jinak včera na besedě se i tohle téma řešilo, jakože co smlouva SKS vs eside... Saša Kliment odpovídal v tom smyslu, že smlouva je už dávno podepsaná a Slavie je v Edenu za nižší nájem než na Strahově. A tato smlouva je podepsána na dlouhou dobu dopředu - prý se konce asi nedožijem :)

Kuťas

1"Je to zastaveni akcii jako forma zaruky pro splaceni stadionu. Nejedna se o prodej. Az Enic za 15 let zaplati posledni splatku, dostane akcie zpatky a Slavia svoje pozemky." - Je tahla varianta možná? Kmotr

1- abc diskuzní fórum e-side.cz

Trošku spekulace....Já bych to viděl na něko, komu jsme hodně dlužili a kdo je jinak velice solventní, ma zkušenosti s fotbalem, ostrá lokty ,obrovský konexe,ale protože je ve stínu největšího prasátka, tak se o něm moc neví....takže mi vychází bohužel Vacek :-( ....Takže nakonec ten Eside, bych ještě bral :-)))a budu doufat, že Ležka rozbil prasátko, který měl ješté z 96. roku doma ve sklepě... LordEdmund

Pokud někoho zajímá, jak je to opravdu, ať se naučí anglicky. Zdraví Tantalos


Uefa spurred to seek new ownership rules


Tottenham's date with Slavia Prague prompts renewed debate about Enic's European portfolio

David Conn
Wednesday September 27, 2006
The Guardian

When Tottenham Hotspur were drawn to face Slavia Prague in the Uefa Cup first round, they were reportedly swift to reassure European football's governing body that the two clubs no longer shared an owner. Enic, the investment vehicle for the Bahamas-based currency-dealing billionaire Joe Lewis, had owned Slavia Prague among its portfolio of European clubs - which, from 2001, also included a large shareholding in Spurs.

Some reports said the clubs dashed to inform Uefa that Enic reduced its 96.7% shareholding in Slavia Prague to a minority interest earlier this year. The match duly went ahead in Prague, Jermaine Jenas joyfully sealing a 1-0 win for Spurs on their return to European competition after seven seasons. Tomorrow night the two clubs meet again at White Hart Lane.

Article continues
Daniel Levy, the Spurs chairman, is an Enic director and shareholder, and the company owns by far the largest stake in Tottenham, so there had been fears the tie might be pulled, falling foul of Uefa's common-sense rule that two clubs controlled by the same owner cannot meet each other. But it turns out that it was not such a close-run thing at all - Uefa's rules are not as robust as it would like them to be.

For two connected clubs to be prevented from playing each other, a person or company has to own "a majority" - more than 50% - of both. At Spurs, although Levy is in charge and is responsible for the strategy which has produced the club's recent improvements on and off the field, Enic's stake is still only 31.5%. And while this represents control in most practical ways, Uefa is unable to accommodate this reality because of European Union law. Much to its frustration, if Enic still owned Slavia as well as 31.5% of Spurs, Uefa would have had to allow the two clubs to play each other.

Uefa's director of communications, William Gaillard, told me this is a major concern - and another reason for the organisation's campaign for sport to be allowed exceptional rules. "We are bound by the European commission's law that control means over 50%," Gaillard said. "But in football this isn't the case. A major sponsor, or a significant shareholder, can be in practical control of a club. Or, as we have seen with MSI [the company which has brought the Argentinian players Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano to West Ham], companies can own players.

"We need specific laws to enable us to protect the integrity of sporting competition. Being in control of a football club should not be measured in the same way as controlling a chemical company."

Uefa intends to develop tighter rules on club ownership if the law is changed following the Independent European Review of Sport - backed by the UK government - which in June recommended that sport be protected for its inherent social and cultural value.

"We want more transparency too," Gaillard said, "to know who owns Enic, who owns MSI, who owns the clubs."

Enic's ultimate owner is a company, Crailes Holdings, registered in the Bahamas, the tax haven where Lewis lives and where little information is provided about companies. An Enic spokesman, however, was happy to confirm that Lewis is behind Enic, with Levy, via family trusts, owning 29%.

"It is very much a joint effort between Joe and Daniel," the spokesman said. "Daniel himself takes responsibility for the decisions at Tottenham."

In the mid-to-late 1990s Enic - the English National Investment Company - embarked on a plan to buy a major football club in every European country. The intention was to pool resources and even players, to cash in on football's revival and television windfalls across the continent. By the time Enic bought 27% of Spurs from Alan Sugar for £22m in 2001, the company owned large stakes in Vicenza in Italy, FC Basle in Switzerland, AEK Athens, Slavia Prague and a big chunk of Rangers in Scotland.

This portfolio turned out to be fraught with difficulties. In May 1998, after Slavia and AEK qualified for the Uefa Cup, Uefa ruled that two clubs in "common ownership" could not play in the same competition. Enic spent £1.3m appealing to the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, which allowed AEK and Slavia to compete pending its decision but ultimately upheld Uefa's ruling because Enic owned more than 50% of both clubs.

Uefa now wants to develop that crude measure into a set of powers to better protect the game's integrity. Levy described the decision then as "a retrograde step for football in Europe", but with its multi-ownership plan in tatters, Enic began to sell all the clubs except its cherished prize, Spurs. After AEK and Basle were offloaded, Enic sold its 20.2% stake in Rangers in August 2004, then Vicenza three months later.

That, according to Enic's most recently published accounts, left only the 31.5% stake in Tottenham and its 96.7% ownership of Slavia Prague. The company appeared to still own Slavia up to July this year, but the spokesman said that in fact Enic reduced its holding in Slavia to a minority interest "earlier this year".

"Apart from Spurs," he said, "the main interest now is property investment."

Levy, Lewis and Tottenham's vice-chairman, Paul Kemsley, are involved in a property development company, Rock Investment Holdings, which has acquired a spread of commercial and residential sites around England. Lewis holds his 50% stake in Rock via a holding company, Rapallo, of which Levy is the sole director. In the year to December 2004, Levy was paid £240,000 by Rapallo; in the year to June 2005, he was also paid £525,000 by Enic for his work as Tottenham's chairman. Rapallo, like Enic, is ultimately owned by Lewis via a company incorporated in the Bahamas.

Kemsley is also involved in a profit-sharing deal with the club itself, partly relating to Spurs' long search for a bigger ground. Tottenham have agreed to pay Kemsley 15% of any profits the club makes from its property investments, a deal some fans have raised objections to, but which Levy defends as a fair return for the work Kemsley will do. Piecemeal, land around White Hart Lane has been bought to create a larger footprint for the stadium, but the club insists it will not expand its current ground unless the project forms part of wider regeneration, involving public money, of the rundown area of Haringey around it.

A Tottenham spokeswoman confirmed the recent story in this paper's Digger column, saying the club "is prepared to discuss" a deal to occupy the new Wembley instead. Spurs could also be interested in moving into the London Olympic stadium, although that is thought unlikely because of the obligation to retain an athletics track.

"We are," she said, "keeping all options open."

Spurs are aware of the financial advantage Arsenal have secured in their 60,000-capacity Emirates Stadium. So Enic's project has changed, from a grand plan for pan-European domination to the gritty work of property development in London N17.

david.conn@guardian.co.uk

Richi, měl bys napsat asi tohle:
Reálný majitel Enicu je jistý pan Joe Lewis, jeden z nejbohatších lidí na světě. Sídlí na Bahamách kvůli daním a živí se operacemi na burze a investicemi. S ním spolupracuje finančně slabší pan Levy, který vede Enic a jeho operace konkrétně řídí, je tedy jakýsi frontman a fackovací panák v jednom.
Jak se dočtete v článku Guardianu výše, Enic se dnes zabývá především investicemi do nemovitostí. Původní plán, založit si vlastní evropskou fotbalovou ligu, kde by hrály týmy z celé Evropy, jim nevyšel. Proto se vzdali - se ztrátou - majetkových podílů v řadě klubů.
Pro pana Lewise to neznamenalo žádnou velkou ztrátu, má víc vajec v jednom košíku a na pár milionech liber mu nezáleží. Finanční ztráty Slavie pro něj jsou zanedbatelné, ale nechtěl prodat Slavii, když na něj před časem čeští podnikatelé vyvíjeli tlak, aby prodal Slavii pod cenou, protože není žádný holý zadek a pár podivných českých Krejčířů pro něj znamená totéž jako pro nás pár rumunských žebráků na Václaváku.
Když loni na jaře hrozilo, že se Slavia a Tottenham vzájemně vyřadí z Poháru UEFA, došlo k finančním operacím, při nichž byla Slavia vyvedena z portfolia Enicu a přepsána na jednu soukromou osobu, zřejmě formálne Levyho, tedy vlastně Lewise To se stalo tedy v červnu. Tottenham nakonec zůstal formálně Enicu a ten ve Spurs před časem získal nadpoloviční většinu
Potom se nějaká sparťanská svině rozhodla, že musí Slavii pokazit radovánky z chystaných nákupů a slavistické fandy musá pořádně nasrat.
Našla si tedy pár vymaštěných idiotů v časopisu Euro. Ten vypadá relativně spolehlivě, jenže od doby, co časopisy nemají peníze a jsou prodělkové, nejsou schopné zaplatit lidi, kteří umějí číst a psát. Nabírají se absolventi středních škol a jedinou kvalifikací je IQ pod šedesát.
Zvláštní kategorií novinářů jsou pak sporťáci, kteři jsou fyzicky zdatnější, ale co jim dal pámbů do nohou, ubral jim na mozku ještě víc, Najít dnes sporťáka schopného přečíst dvě řádky anglického textu za míň než hodinu je prakticky nemožné.
A tak když nějaká hovada v Euru pustí absolutní hovadinu do éteru, ještě blbější hovada v těch různých idnesech a apod z toho dělají senzaci. A z vás si dělají srandu. Většina médií by dnes měla být zakázána, protože provozují skrytou prostituci, napíšou za pár babek jakoukoli sračku
tantalos